CHEMTRAIL REPORT- 12/10/2010
Javigar is Spanish and the videos are also but you get the picture!
Javigar from Madrid Spain writes,
I certainly will not get lost.
TE perplexed, IS AN AUTHENTIC SPECTATOR CLOUDS CLEAR, see how the chemicals sprayed in the atmosphere is literally eat the clouds, OF COURSE TO CHECK, HE SLIGHTLY INCREASED SPEED.
*These videos show some of the effects these patents produce. The content of these aerosol sprays are very bad for agriculture and living organisms. Causing drought conditions and killing plant and cellular life, are byproducts of these sprays.
For months, here in Tennessee, they have absolutely worn the skies out. They are spraying so much material in the sky it is blanketing the sky from horizon to horizon. If this stuff is as bad for you as the scientist are saying it is, the public is going to be “hit” health wise, all at once.
Then, I guess everyone will take notice.
Yesterday must have been Chemtrail alert day. I also got an email from a friend in S. America, who sent an article with some of the best information I have seen yet on the subject.
It is filled with links that are excellent and tells how the UN has already passed a resolution to stop the spraying but the USA is ignoring it, and all for the money.
It is all about the global warming carbon credit trading market. 191 countries have formed a new bank with the USA in which the US has over 2 million voting shares. The next down the line is 500,000 shares. I hadn’t heard anything about this “new bank” until I started poring through the minutes of the Cancun “G” meeting that ended yesterday.
What this means to me is that the Corporation of the United States (for profit), is using all the property and resource assets of America, including us a tax income base. This is the only thing that makes sense dollar wise.
Point is, these people want all that carbon credit trading money and they want it now. This is our government folks and they have converted our country into a corporate run business for profit, with Washington self delegated as the Board of Directors of this corporation.
A bad deal for Americans and a great deal for the financial institutions that bought Obama into office. Then he followed suit by bring in the rest of his crew. They are blanketing our atmosphere with tons upon tons of toxic metals, thorium and barium. TONS!!!!!
Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), said, "This week has got us closer to a structured set of decisions that can be agreed on, in Cancun ... This is the greatest societal and economic transformation that the world has ever seen."
Here is one of the best reports I’ve seen yet:
By Rady Ananda
In Cancun, Mexico, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is under pressure to overturn the UN ban on chemtrails. This would dissolve an agreement reached in October at the UN Convention on Biological Diversity conference in Japan. In that landmark decision, the 193-member CBD agreed by consensus to a moratorium on geoengineering projects and experiments.
The US has not agreed to it. Citing profits, the US further refuses to cut greenhouse gas emissions attributed to global warming, the purported concern of the United Nations. Instead, it seeks to expand its geoengineering projects for which hundreds of patents have already been filed. (See sampling below.)
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) opened the Cancun conference last week by discussing geoengineering options that will be further explored in Peru later this year. Such environmental modification (ENMOD) programs include putting mirrors in space, iron seeding the oceans, planting genetically modified forests, and chemtrailing the skies. Of course, all of these activities are already well underway.
The next UN climate change assessment report, AR5, is due out in November of 2014. It will include geoengineering options, said Indian businessman and economist, Rajendra Pachauri, who chairs the IPCC. In his introductory comments in Cancun, he stated, “The scope of the AR5 has also been expanded over and above previous reports, and would include, for instance, focused treatment of subjects like clouds and aerosols, geo-engineering options,” and the usual climate related issues.
Shady Science and Corporate Profits.
The IPCC has been condemned for inflating temperature records and exaggerating estimates of glacial retreat. IPCC chair Rajendra Pachauri has also been criticized for his “extensive interests in companies that stand to benefit from carbon trading,” and for using his position “to attract major funding to his own organization, The Energy and Resources Institute2 (TERI), known previously (and concurrently by some), as the Tata Energy Research Institute,” noted the Science and Public Policy Institute in an April 2010 investigative report entitled, “Dr Rajendra Pachauri and the IPCC – No Fossil Fool.”
The Tata Group, “has a total market capitalization worldwide of some $77 billion, with major involvement in energy and energy-related industries, including carbon trading,” reports SPPI.
Tata is also linked to India’s war on tribes. Ongoing corporate ecoterrorism and land grabs led world-renowned author Arundhati Roy to agitate on behalf of indigenous peoples, demanding freedom for the people of Kashmir’s disputed territory. Last week, Delhi filed charges against her for defense of tribes characterizing it as “waging war against the state.” Corporate dominance was slowed, however, when a ‘real Avatar tribe’ won a stunning victory over mining giant, Vedanta Resources, last August. (See the 11-minute, award-winning film, “Mine: Story of a Sacred Mountain.”)
It bears repeating that the man connected to Tata, Mr. Rajendra Pachauri, chairs the IPCC which advises the UN on climate actions.
Global governance on geoengineering has a history of profiteering. See, e.g., Chief sponsor of landmark climate manipulation conference maintains close financial ties to controversial geo-engineering company, by Joe Romm, Climate Progress, 18 Mar 2010. For a partial list of patents for stratospheric aerial spraying programs from 1917 thru mid-2003, see Lori Kramer’s Patently Obvious: A Partial History of Aerosol and Weather Related Technologies.”
In CASE ORANGE: Contrail Science, Its Impact on Climate and Weather Manipulation Programs Conducted by the United States and Its Allies,” researchers revealed that “the proposed scenario by the IPCC in 2001 is identical to the claims” in Hughes Aircraft’s 1991 patent. Hughes was acquired by Raytheon, a major defense contractor, in 1997.
Delivery systems aren’t the only types of patents related to chemtrails. Aluminum is part of the various metal-chemical cocktails sprayed and is highly toxic to plants, therefore representing a serious threat to normal agriculture. For over thirteen years, biotech scientists have researched aluminum resistant genes in plants, finally isolating one in 2007. Today, a “new generation of genetically engineered crop research” seeks to develop aluminum-resistance in commercial crops.
Environmental watchdog ETC Group* notes in its 56-page report, “Geopiracy: The Case Against Geoengineering,” that, “there is a complex web of connections between big capital and the global technofixers, comprised of researchers, multinational corporations and small start-ups, the military establishment and respected think tanks, policy makers and politicians. The non-profit institutions that promote geoengineering are well connected with the private sector.”
On December 6th, energy and environmental ministers from around the world began meeting to discuss a “balanced package of decisions.” Louise Gray at The Telegraph advises, “It is generally agreed that a global deal to cut emissions is unlikely.”
Instead, these UN meetings on climate change appear to be more about protecting pollutive industry practices and promoting another environmentally toxic industry: geoengineering. It would almost be laughable except for the homicidal and ecocidal affect of such plans.
*Blogger Cassandra Anderson recently noted that the ETC Group is partly funded by the Ford Foundation, “known for supporting depopulation.” So far, ETC has adamantly opposed geoengineering, as well as genetic engineering, both suspected depopulation tools. However, ETC also denies current ENMOD activities, saying “there is no actual deployment to govern.”
In “Confronting the ‘futuristic’ branding of geoengineering,” mass perception management and the ETC Group are explored in more detail.
Rady Ananda’s work has appeared in several online and print publications. She holds a B.S. in Natural Resources from The Ohio State University’s School of Agriculture. Using years of editorial experience and web publishing, Rady now promotes the ideas and work of a select group of quality writers and artists at Food Freedom and COTO Report.
December 9, 2010
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 36, L19703, doi:10.1029/2009GL039209, 2009
Benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineering
Alan Robock, Allison Marquardt, and Ben Kravitz
Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University,
New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University,
New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
Now at Department of Environmental Science, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology,
Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
 Injecting sulfate aerosol precursors into the stratosphere has been suggested as a means of geoengineering to cool the planet and reduce global warming. The decision to implement such a scheme would require a comparison of its benefits, dangers, and costs to those of other responses to global warming, including doing nothing. Here we evaluate those factors for stratospheric geoengineering with sulfate aerosols. Using existing U.S. military fighter and tanker planes, the annual costs of injecting aerosol precursors into the lower stratosphere would be several billion dollars. Using artillery or balloons to loft the gas would be much more expensive. We do not have enough information to evaluate more exotic techniques, such as pumping the gas up through a hose attached to a tower or balloon system. Anthropogenic stratospheric aerosol injection would cool the planet, stop the melting of sea ice and land-based glaciers, slow sea level rise, and increase the terrestrial carbon sink, but produce regional drought, ozone depletion, less sunlight for solar power, and make skies less blue. Furthermore it would hamper Earth-based optical astronomy, do nothing to stop ocean acidification, and present many ethical and moral issues. Further work is needed to quantify many of these factors to allow informed decision-making.
Received 21 May 2009; revised 17 August 2009; accepted 20 August 2009; published 2 October 2009.
Index Terms: 1616 Global Change: Climate variability (1635, 3305, 3309, 4215, 4513); 0370 Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Volcanic effects (8409); 1630 Global Change: Impacts of global change (1225); 1620 Global Change: Climate dynamics (0429, 3309).